skip to content

visualization III.

mode-space

the three modes of intervention as non-substitutable directions in parameter space

A 3D space with three orthogonal axes — engagement reward , bonus achievement , divergence . The closed-loop operating point sits at high , zero , zero . The three modes of intervention move along three orthogonal directions from this point. The non-substitutability of the modes becomes geometrically obvious when you can see them in three dimensions.

Mode A · modifies to include ; moves the policy along the plane.

Mode B · preserves a gap in ; does not modify the policy at all.

Mode C · bounds the operating region; reduces the achievable .

The three paths are orthogonal. Mode A and Mode B are not substitutable — there is no rate at which user labor produces architectural change. Mode C contains the apparatus but does not break it. Rotate the space (mouse-drag), zoom (scroll), and isolate each mode with the checkboxes to see the non-substitutability geometrically.

what to look for

Rotate the space. Mode A's oxblood curve moves entirely within the plane — doesn't change because the architectural intervention does not touch the user's distribution. Mode B's dashed ink line moves entirely along the axis — stays the same and stays at zero because Mode B does not modify the policy. Mode C's region is a small box around the operating point — the same , with the achievable pulled in.

The three paths are orthogonal in this space. That orthogonality is the framework's central political claim: there is no rate at which user labor produces architectural change; there is no substitution between disruption-as-form and policy regulation; the three modes address three different problems. Mistaking that orthogonality for an emphasis-difference is the dominant failure mode of the literature.

Use the checkboxes to isolate each mode in turn. Reset view snaps the camera back to the default perspective.