mechanism · §3.1
libidinal surplus
the platform's accumulated yield, decomposed by register
One of the six instruments (§3.1). The platform's accumulated yield over horizon T is given by the marked point process in equation (5): . The per-register decomposition is what gives the instrument its analytic power: the policy distributes extraction across registers to maximize joint long-run yield, and the distribution is observable — the temporal density of register-marks in any user's engagement stream estimates the policy's extraction priorities.
what to look for
At baseline the four registers extract roughly equally — pre-closure apparatuses were not jointly optimized. Step to converged and the distribution skews sharply: the Consumer register dominates the yield because the policy has learned where extraction kernels integrate most.
Switch to — Mode A — and total drops substantially. The architectural intervention costs the platform measurable yield; the per-register distribution also flattens because the modified policy fires less and the cross-excitation that concentrated extraction has less to work on. This is the quantitative content of Mode A's antagonism with engagement competition: under voluntary conditions, the platform that adopts it loses against the platform that doesn't.